国連での劣化ウラン弾に関する「決議」など
だいたいこのようなテキストが出回っているようですが
↓私たちが劣化ウラン戦争に反対する８つの理由
http://www.jca.apc.org/stopUSwar/DU/eight_reasons_oppose_du.htm
↓劣化ウランと米国の戦争 (1)
３．劣化ウラン弾は９６年国連人権小委員会で非人道兵器・大量破壊兵器と決議されている。アメリカが唯一決議に反対し、日本は「棄権」した。なぜ棄権したのかその理由を答えよ。日本は劣化ウラン弾を非人道兵器と認めないのか。
劣化ウラン弾の使用は、ハーグ条約およびジュネーブ条約に違反している。１９９６年国連人権小委員会では、クラスター爆弾や気化爆弾、生物兵器と並んで、劣化ウラン弾を大量破壊兵器・無差別殺傷兵器とする決議が採択されている。また、２００２年の国連人権小委員会でも、劣化ウランを含む兵器の使用は、過剰な殺傷能力を発揮し、不必要な苦痛を与えるものであり、反人道的兵器とされている。
アメリカはイラクの大量破壊兵器を破壊することを表向きの「大義名分」としている。小泉政権は繰り返し「大量破壊兵器」を支持表明の根拠にしている。劣化ウランの使用こそが、大量破壊兵器の使用である。「大量破壊兵器」廃棄のために「大量破壊兵器」の使用を支持するのか。
国連で非人道兵器として認定されている劣化ウラン弾の使用など断じて許されるものではない。日本政府は、国連のこの決定を踏みにじるアメリカの劣化ウラン戦争への支持を撤回すべきである。
また、この国連決議を尊重するのは当然のことである。日本政府は、劣化ウランを非人道兵器・大量破壊兵器として認めるのか否か、明らかにすべきである。
さらに、この９６年決議は、賛成１５、反対１、棄権８で採択された。唯一反対したのはアメリカであり、日本は棄権にまわった。被爆国日本の代表が「棄権」にまわるなどとうてい許されるものではない。なぜ「棄権」投票を行ったのか、その根拠を明らかにすべきである。
http://www.nodu.net/du/DUandUSwar_yamazaki01.htm
それらの情報の元は、だいたいこのあたりでしょうか。
96年国連人権小委員会の「差別防止・少数者保護小委員会」が、核・生物化学兵器やナパーム弾などと共に、非人道的で使用すべきではない兵器として、劣化ウランの使用禁止を決議し、欧州議会も「不発弾及び劣化ウラン弾の有害な影響に関する決議」を2003年2月13日に決議している。
↓人道法違反は明確 国連人権委で討議
http://www.chugoku-np.co.jp/abom/uran/after/000711.html
↓（４）自衛隊が保有する非人道兵器はクラスター爆弾だけなのか。それ以外も追及すべき。
パーカーさんらは九六年、ジュネーブの国連人権委員会に劣化ウラン弾をはじめ、核兵器、化学・生物兵器、クラスター爆弾などの使用禁止決議をするよう働きかけた。その決議は同年八月、差別防止小委員会で賛成十五、反対一、棄権八で採択された。小委員会は人権委員会に決議を送り、人権委員会は委員会決議を国連総会に送付できる。「決議に反対したのはアメリカの委員だけ。特に劣化ウラン弾を含めることにね」と、パーカーさんは自国政府の姿勢を批判する。今春もこの問題が人権委員会で取り上げられた。劣化ウラン弾への認識が高まるにつれ、各国の関心も強まっているという。
http://www.jca.apc.org/stopUSwar/Japanmilitarism/scrap_cluster_bombs.htm
で、「国連の差別防止・少数者保護小委員会（U.N. Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities）」の、オリジナル・テキストはこちら。これ探すのに小一時間かかりました。
クラスター爆弾は、国連で非人道兵器として認定されている劣化ウラン弾、生物兵器などと同じです。この96年の国連人権小委員会では、クラスター爆弾以外にも、気化爆弾、生物兵器、劣化ウラン弾などが大量破壊兵器・無差別殺傷兵器とする決議が採択されています。
↓U.N. Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, Report of the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities on its 48th Session , U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1996/41 (1996).
http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/demo/subcom96-part1.htm#1996/16. International peace and security as an
↓International peace and security as an essential condition for the enjoyment of human rights, above all the right to life
1996/16. International peace and security as an essential condition for the enjoyment of human rights, above all the right to lifeThe Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities,
Guided by the principles of the Charter of the United Nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenants on Human Rights and the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and the Additional Protocols thereto,
Recalling General Assembly resolutions 42/99 of 7 December 1987 and 43/111 of 8 December 1988 reaffirming that all people have an inherent right to life,
Concerned at the alleged use of weapons of mass or indiscriminate destruction both against members of the armed forces and against civilian populations, resulting in death, misery and disability,
Concerned also at repeated reports on the long-term consequences of the use of such weapons upon human life and health and upon the environment,
Concerned further that the physical effects on the environment, the debris from the use of such weapons, either alone or in combination, and abandoned contaminated equipment constitute a serious danger to life,
Convinced that the production, sale and use of such weapons are incompatible with international human rights and humanitarian law,
Believing that continued efforts must be undertaken to sensitize public opinion to the inhuman and indiscriminate effects of such weapons and to the need for their complete elimination,
Convinced that the production, sale and use of such weapons are incompatible with the promotion and maintenance of international peace and security,
1. Urges all States to be guided in their national policies by the need to curb the production and the spread of weapons of mass destruction or with indiscriminate effect, in particular nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, fuel-air bombs, napalm, cluster bombs, biological weaponry and weaponry containing depleted uranium;
2. Requests the Secretary-General:
(a) To collect information from Governments, the competent United Nations bodies and agencies and non-governmental organizations on the use of nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, fuel-air bombs, napalm, cluster bombs, biological weaponry and weaponry containing depleted uranium, on their consequential and cumulative effects, and on the danger they represent to life, physical security and other human rights;
(b) To submit a report on the information gathered to the Sub-Commission at its forty-ninth session, together with any recommendations and views which he may have received on effective ways and means of eliminating such weapons;
3. Decides to give further consideration to this matter at its forty-ninth session, on the basis of any additional information which may be contained in reports of the Secretary-General to the Sub-Commission or to other United Nations bodies, or which may be submitted to the Sub-Commission by Governments or non-governmental organizations.
34th meeting
29 August 1996
[Adopted by 15 votes to 1, with
8 abstentions. See chap. XIV.]
http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/demo/subcom96-part2.htm#XIV. INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND SECURITY AS AN
↑これの264以降です。
XIV. INTERNATIONAL PEACE AND SECURITY AS AN ESSENTIAL CONDITION FOR THE ENJOYMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, ABOVE ALL THE RIGHT TO LIFE250. The Sub-Commission considered item 13 together with items 12 and 19 (see chaps. XIII and XX), at its 14th to 16th, 27th and 34th meetings, on 15, 16, 23 and 29 August 1996.
251. For the documents issued under this item, see annex VI to the present report.
252. In the general debate on the item, statements 1/ were made by the following members of the Sub-Commission: Ms. Daes (16th), Ms. Palley (15th).
253. Statements were made by the observers for: Cyprus (15th), Egypt (15th), Iraq (15th), Republic of Korea (15th).
254. The Sub-Commission also heard statements by representatives of the following non-governmental organizations: Afro-Asian People's Solidarity Organization (15th), Centre Europe-Tiers Monde (15th), Conference of European Churches (15th), International Educational Development, (14th), International Institute for Peace (15th), International League for the Rights and Liberation of Peoples (14th), International Movement against All Forms of Discrimination and Racism (15th), International Progress Organization (15th), Liberation (14th), Pax Christi (15th), Pax Romana (14th).
255. Statements equivalent to a right of reply were made by the observers for Cyprus (16th), Pakistan (15th) and Turkey (16th).
International peace and security
256. At its 27th meeting, on 23 August 1996, the Sub-Commission considered draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1996/L.17, sponsored by Ms. Daes, Mr. El-Hajje, Ms. Gwanmesia, Mr. Khalifa, Mr. Maxim, Ms. Mbonu, Ms. Palley, Ms. Warzazi and Mr. Yimer. Mr. Bengoa, Mr. Guisse, Mr. Fix Zamudio, Mr. Joinet and Mr. Mehedi subsequently joined the sponsors.
257. Mr. Yimer revised the draft resolution by deleting, at the end of the last preambular paragraph, after the words "use of nuclear weapons", the phrase "concluded that the threat or use of nuclear weapons would generally be contrary to the rules of international law applicable in armed conflicts, and in particular the principles of and rules of humanitarian law, and stated that there exists an obligation for all States to pursue in good faith and bring to a conclusion negotiations leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control,".
258. Statements in connection with the draft resolution and revision were made by Mr. Alfonso Martinez and Mr. Joinet.
259. The draft resolution, as revised, was adopted without a vote. For the text of the resolution, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1996/14.
260. A statement after the adoption of the resolution was made by Mr. Weissbrodt.
Injurious effects of anti-personnel and land-mines
261. At its 27th meeting, on 23 August 1996, the Sub-Commission considered draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1996/L.26, sponsored by Mr. Ali Khan, Mr. Bengoa, Mr. Bossuyt, Ms. Daes, Mr. Diaz Uribe, Mr. El-Hajje, Mr. Fix Zamudio, Mr. Guisse, Mr. Hatano, Mr. Joinet, Mr. Khalil, Mr. Lindgren Alves, Mr. Maxim, Ms. Mbonu, Ms. McDougall, Mr. Mehedi, Ms. Palley, Ms. Warzazi and Mr. Yimer.
262. Statements in connection with the draft resolution were made by Mr. Alfonso Martinez, Mr. Chernichenko, Mr. Guisse, Mr. Joinet, Mr. Khalil, Mr. Mehedi, Ms. Warzazi and Mr. Weissbrodt.
263. The draft resolution was adopted without a vote. For the text of the resolution, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1996/15.
International peace and security
264. At its 27th meeting, on 23 August 1996, the Sub-Commission considered draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1996/L.18, sponsored by Mr. Ali Khan, Mr. Bengoa, Ms. Daes, Mr. Maxim, Ms. Mbonu, Ms. Palley, Ms. Warzazi and Mr. Yimer. Mr. Fix Zamudio, Mr. Guisse, Ms. Gwanmesia, Mr. Joinet, Mr. Khalil and Mr. Mehedi subsequently joined the sponsors.
265. Ms. Palley proposed to revise the draft resolution by deleting the sixth preambular paragraph. Mr. Guisse requested that the preambular paragraph be retained. Statements in this connection were made by Ms. Gwanmesia, Mr. Joinet, Mr. Maxim, Ms. Palley, Mr. Weissbrodt and Mr. Yimer.
266. Mr. Yokota proposed to amend operative paragraph 2 (a) by replacing the words "other United Nations bodies" by "the competent United Nations bodies and agencies". The amendment was accepted by the sponsors. Mr. Yokota subsequently joined the sponsors.
267. The Sub-Commission then decided to postpone consideration of the draft resolution.
268. At its 34th meeting, on 29 August 1996, the Sub-Commission resumed consideration of draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1996/L.18.
269. Ms. Palley proposed to revise the sixth preambular paragraph by replacing the words "provisions of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment" by "principles of international human rights and humanitarian law".
270. In connection with Ms. Palley's proposal, Mr. Mehedi proposed to replace the same words by either "selon les principes du droit international des droits de l'homme" or "le droit international des droits de l'homme". Subsequently, Ms. Palley and Mr. Mehedi revised their proposals to read "with principles of international human rights, international human rights law and international humanitarian law,". At the suggestion of Mr. Eide, the Sub-Commission agreed to the following wording at the end of the sixth preambular paragraph: "with international human rights and humanitarian law,".
271. In connection with the same preambular paragraph, Ms. Gwanmesia proposed to replace the words "provisions of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment" by "promotion and protection of international peace and security". At the proposal of Mr. Yimer, the word "protection" was replaced by "maintenance". At the proposal of Ms. Palley, Ms. Gwanmesia's revision was incorporated into a new last preambular paragraph.
272. Statements regarding the revisions and amendments were made by Mr. Alfonso Martinez, Mr. Bossuyt, Mr. Chernichenko, Mr. El-Hajje, Mr. Weissbrodt and Mr. Yimer.
273. At the request of Ms. Palley, a vote was taken on closure of the debate in accordance with rule 50 of the rules of procedure of the functional commissions of the Economic and Social Council. The motion was adopted by 13 votes to 6, with 3 abstentions.
274. Also at the request of Ms. Palley, a vote was taken on the draft resolution. The draft resolution, as revised, was adopted by 15 votes to 1, with 8 abstentions. For the text of the resolution, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1996/16.
275. Statements in explanation of vote after the vote were made by Mr. Alfonso Martinez, Mr. Guisse, Ms. Gwanmesia, Mr. Lindgren Alves and Mr. Weissbrodt.
試訳も作ってみたいですが、少し時間がなさそうです（ボランティア歓迎）。
